Why pay tax on a critical business expense such as Ransom?
That’s right! In a landmark judgement by the High Court of MP, Ransom money was considered as a business expense allowable for a tax rabate!
One day Khemchand Motilal Jain, went to buy tendu leaves from the forest, which is raw material for his Beedi manufacturing unit. On the way, he got abducted by the dreaded Raju Bhatnagar’s gang and had to pay over half a million rupees as ransom for his freedom. Jain filed Rs. 5.50 lacs ransom as “General expenses” for seeking tax rebate under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 while filing his IT returns which obviously raised quite a controversy.
Interestingly, there were conflicting opinions within members of the IT (Income tax) department and the matter was referred to the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. Amongst others, the high court validated following key points before allowing the tax rebate:-
a. It is NOT an illegal expense
Kidnapping for ransom is an offence u/s 364 A of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), however the payment of ransom to secure the release of a kidnapped person is not an offense or prohibited by law.
b. It WAS on grounds of Commercial expediency
Jain was a whole time director of the business and the amount was towards his release and expediency. The amount paid was towards avoiding harassment, in this case saving the life of the Director and resume business operations.
Such a judgement does restore faith in the Indian Judiciary system however, this has the potential to open flood gates to a whole lot of new issues. We know some tax payers could go to any limits to avoid paying money to the government. Perhaps a rise in misuse of the provision by staging false cases of kidnapping and other speed money arenas. Perhaps, paying a bribe can be challenged to be no different from paying Ransom and draws the same rebate. Perhaps, this becomes a new line of crime for some unemployed youth in the suburbs having a new “Business logic”. Maybe high profile criminals agree on wire transfers to foreign banks.









As you dither over the inscrutable dilemma
Alas! where is that elusive spark?
























‘The vast majority of our imports come from outside the country.’
‘We’ve got a lot of relations with countries in our neighborhood.’
Much contrary to Akshay Kumar’s macho image of being a class action hero & a super comedian in his recent blockbusters, he is mostly a cry-baby in the film who is seen weeping with tears rolling down. After seeing his foster father being killed in front of his eyes by the Chinese villain, he is convinced to avenge it and approaches an old policeman for learning Cosmic Kung Fu. He is taught so, on principles of Shaolin but without an iota of seriousness as he keeps cribbing and making fun of the steps, not to forget his utter disrespect for the master. What finally helps him win the ultimate fight are his cooking skills from the Chandni Chowk dhaba. Deepika Padukone looks very fit & vibrant in her Chinese attire and performs a double role and martial arts very impressively. Ranvir Shorey also has a great comical start but his role later reduces to a mere informer lacking any punch.
The Chinese crime-lord Hojo (played by a Chinese superstar Gorden Liu), wears his signature black hat that is thrown as a boomerang to slit throats. Warner brothers being one of the producers of this movie might have contributed to bring comic features in Akshay, with smoke coming out of his ears and getting kicked to outer space and back, but it fails to tickle the funny bone. In fact, its unintended scenes of violence make many kids cry. There is occasional slapstick comedy which is entertaining but the movie is otherwise a drag. I could never imagine writing a blog review for this movie, but hey such an over hyped & yet disappointing film comes only once in a while
Author